Bond Squad Information

For more information regarding Bond Squad reports and services, visit the following website or e-mail thomas.byrne@wsandm.com

Coincidence?

We have discussed several times how corporations are using debt to facilitate share repurchases and how higher interest rates might not only bring an end to the share buyback trend, but could, eventually, result in corporations selling shares in the future (to pay for maturing debt if interest rates are too high to make debt refinancing economically feasible). Some readers have expressed doubt as to the relationship between debt issuance and share repurchases. Thus, when MetLife announced it was repurchasing $1 billion worth of common shares, we decided to look at MET’s 2014 debt issuance. The last U.S. dollar-denominated bond issued by MetLife was the 3.60% due 4/10/24. The bonds are dated 4/10/14. The size of the bond issue was $1 billion. What was the stated use of the proceeds? According to MetLife, the proceeds are to be used for “General Corporate Purpose.” Maybe the fact that MetLife issued $1billion of debt and two months later it buys back $1 billion of common shares was a coincidence. Then again… Using debt to repurchase shares is not necessarily a bad thing. When interest rates are low, debt-fueled common stock buybacks might make sense for corporations and can be positive events for stockholders. However, just as corporations might use debt sale proceeds to repurchase shares when rates are low, they can re-issue common shares to pay off maturing debt when borrowing costs are higher. Investors who own stocks which have benefitted from share repurchases should be mindful of this when interest rates begin to climb.

On the Dark Side

On the Dark Side Risk assets have had an impressive run during the past few years. In fact, risk asset performance has been more robust than economic data. A popular selling pitch among wholesalers was that risk assets are attractive because they were performing well and they tend to do well when the economy gains momentum. The reality is; the capital markets tend to get ahead of the economy. When there is a glimmer of a recovery, sophisticated investors tend to act proactively. By the time economic data appears to justify risk asset valuations, the best (if not all) opportunities are in the rearview mirror. The process was accelerated because of extreme monetary policy accommodation (resulting in very low interest rates) which forced investors into risk assets well before fundamental data justified such valuations. The second wave was that of investors who believed that the Fed would be successful. The third wave of investors into risk assets consisted mainly of those who missed the best opportunities and have finally capitulated and are pouring money into risk assets, often using the idea that risk assets should outperform as the economy improves. It is our opinion that the best days of risk assets are probably behind us for now. This is evidenced by the fact that higher-quality fixed income investments have performed as well (if not better) than their high-risk brethren. We are not unique in this view (although we have been among the first to suggest moving up in quality and to shorten duration on the long end of bond portfolios). During the past month we have witnessed an increasing number of fixed income market participants and portfolio managers move toward our position. We have read articles in various publications which featured interviews with fixed income money managers who believe: • Low foreign sovereign yields could hold down long-dated U.S. Treasury note and bond yields. • It is time to take on some duration. • It is time to reduce exposure in junk bonds and banks loans, particularly in the CCC and lower area of the credit spectrum. If one searches the Wall Street Journal, Barron’s or Bloomberg News, one can find multiple articles speaking to this. It is our opinion that further price appreciation in junk debt (bonds or loans) could be problematic. Interest income should be the prime drivers of returns among lower-rated fixed income securities. As such, we believe that it is in the best interest of our readers and asset management clients, for whom high yield investments are appropriate, to focus on BB-rated high yield credits. This is not to say that values cannot be had in B-rated bonds, but in this environment, the lower you reach, the more selective you need to be. Into the Great Wide Libor Spread For the past five years, we have preferred step-up notes over floating-rating rate securities. The notable exception has been fixed-to-float securities with attractive fixed coupons, a long fixed period and a floating spread over their typical Three-month Libor benchmark of at least 300 basis points. We advised readers to avoid fixed-to-float securities with low fixed coupons and, particularly, those with very narrow floating-rate spreads. Our thinking has been that the Fed might not raise short-term rates for a long-time and, when it does, rate increases could be moderate and gradual. Thus far, this strategy has worked out well. We continue to favor this strategy when building out the long end of a fixed income ladder or barbell. Our long-time readers (especially those who followed us at Citigroup) should recall that we were calling for a long-period of low Fed Funds Rates and a lower-than normal equilibrium rate as far back as 2010. Not much has changed in our outlook, except that we are probably about a year away from the start of Fed Funds Rate hikes. Our advice to readers considering floating-rate or fixed-to-float securities is to not be drawn in by the lower prices typically found with securities offering narrow floating spreads. The reason they are trading at lower prices than their wider-spread brethren is because narrow coupon spreads might not offer much interest rate (or asset price) protection in a rising rate environment. Subscribers are encouraged to run any and all fixed income investment ideas by us prior to purchasing. All that Glitters is Gone Emerging markets debt has made an impressive comeback since bottoming in early February. Supporters of EM debt have bloviated about how EM fear was overdone. We are not so certain. Remember, it was rising U.S. interest rates which put EM economies under pressure, particularly EM economies running high current account deficits. The decline in U.S. Treasury yields has taken the pressure off many troubled EM economies. However, few of these economies have begun the structural changes necessary to withstand rising interest rates in the U.S. As our base case is for long-term U.S. interest rates to creep higher over time, we view the rally in EM debt as an opportunity to reduce exposure in emerging market sovereign debt, if one is overexposed based on their goals, objectives and risk tolerances. In the EM space, we are most positive on South Korea, Mexico and Poland and are cautiously optimistic on India. We prefer corporate bonds over sovereign debt, particularly among export-driven businesses. Yesterday, EM market participants pointed to Exports data as a sign that China’s economy is healing. China’s Exports surged 7.0% in May versus 0.9% in April. There is little doubt that the PBOC’s weakening of the yuan has helped drive Chinese exports. However, it might have hurt Imports which came in -1.6% in May. Yesterday, the PBOC began shoring-up the yuan. It might be that the Chinese economy could be leveling off, but whether or not it will begin accelerating soon remains unanswered. China continues to combat trouble in its banking system and is dealing with domestic demand which has disappointed. News out of China is that banks are moving to secure metal stores at warehouses as concerns about collateral fraud increase. Readers might be aware of reports earlier this year regarding the wide use of metals (such as copper) for loan collateral. As metals prices declined during the past year, the collateral backing some loans became insufficient. Concerns are mounting that the same metals collateral might have been pledged for multiple loans. It might be that some loans have little or no collateral backing them. The Wall Street Journal reports that some foreign banks are conducting investigations pertaining to loan collateral and have ceased lending to some Chinese-based commodities traders. Our view on investing in China is to look for opportunities elsewhere. There is much work to be done in the Middle Kingdom before its financial system can be seen as legitimate in terms of western standards.